News
The EU’s decision to restrict aromatic mineral oils (MOAH) in food products has been hailed as an important step in food safety and consumer protection but consumer organisation, Foodwatch, is calling for binding regulation to go one step further.
The European Union (EU) has confirmed it will restrict mineral oils in all food products. The decision was made by the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed (PAFF Committee), which agreed to set limits for aromatic mineral oils (MOAH) in foodstuffs. The PAFF Committee comprises representatives from all EU countries and the European Commission.

Concerns have been raised about the presence of the complex mixtures in food due to MOAH’s potentially carcinogenic and genotoxic nature.
While the newly-agreed constraints are imposed with immediate effect, they are not yet legally binding. As a result, individual member states can choose whether to enforce the new MOAH requirements or not.
Non-profit organisation Foodwatch says that while the recent decision is a “crucial step for food safety” and consumer protection, it does not go far enough, arguing that a binding regulation is vital to prevent any detectable MOAH from making its way into EU food products.
“The problem with mineral oil contamination in food has been known for many years—but food producers have done too little about it, and those responsible in politics have stood by and watched,” says Andreas Winkler, director of media and public relations at Foodwatch.
Justin Boucher, operations director at Food Packaging Forum Foundation, adds: “From a consumer health perspective, setting limits on known hazardous chemicals, of course, aims to reduce consumer exposure and therefore better protect public health from these chemicals.”
The EU committee has set the limits for the allowed MOAH content in food products. In dry foods with a low fat/oil content equal to or less than 4%, 0.5 mg/kg of MOAH is permitted. For foods with a higher fat/oil content of more than 4%, 1 mg/kg of MOAH is authorised, while 2 mg/kg of MOAH is permitted for fats and oils.
“However, the limits proposed by the EU are too low,” says Winkler. “We demand a strict zero tolerance for MOAH, which are potentially carcinogenic and genotoxic: there should be no detectable MOAH in any foodstuff in the European Union,” adds Winkler.
After exploring the newly imposed limits, Foodwatch states it would be technically possible to identify 1 mg/kg of MOAH in vegetable oils. As a result, it states that the limit of 2 mg in vegetable oils is too high.
Foodwatch says the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) risk assessment into MOAH needs to go “a step further”.
EFSA plans to release a revised risk assessment for mineral oils at the end of 2022.
“With carcinogenic contaminants, even a small amount is too much,” says Winkler. “Technology exists to detect low levels of MOAH – if any detection at all, the foodstuff must be taken off the shelves.”
German food tester, Ökotest, reviewed 19 olive oils and found that all but one were contaminated with mineral oil components. MOAH was found in approximately a third of the olive oil products tested.
Packaging is also under the spotlight, accompanying harvesting and processing machines, as this also be a reason for mineral oil contamination. Mineral oils can be found in printing inks that then potentially migrate to food contained within the packaging, the organisation relays.
Beyond the PAFF committee’s decision to restrict limits of MOAH, attention now turns to whether any further calls from consumer organisations like Foodwatch will prompt MOAH level restrictions in food to become legally binding.
“Food companies must do everything in their power to keep their products clean and safe,” Winkler relays.
11 Mar 2026
The EU's olive oil market is highly regulated to ensure quality, safety, and traceability – but a recent audit found control system gaps that need improving.
Read more
9 Mar 2026
Mondelēz International will need to make successful products with plant-based ingredients if it is to meet its long-term climate commitments, it says.
Read more
6 Mar 2026
EFSA scientists will investigate the health risks of microplastics by 2027 – but what should food brands do in the meantime?
Read more
5 Mar 2026
British retailer Marks and Spencer has introduced 12 new products to its 'Only … Ingredients' range, as brands are advised to focus on “transparent communication”.
Read more
2 Mar 2026
Lidl is “setting the pace” in Europe's transition towards sustainable food systems. How did other European supermarkets score, according to Superlist Environment Europe 2026?
Read more
27 Feb 2026
For healthy indulgent products, messaging around enjoyment resonates more strongly than “guilt-free”, according to a study by EIT Food.
Read more
25 Feb 2026
Dogs fed on premium, meat-rich pet food can have bigger dietary carbon footprints than their owners – but using by-products is a “highly relevant” solution for brands.
Read more
24 Feb 2026
Herbs, spices, and white powders are highly at risk of food fraud – but the industry is embracing food fingerprinting coupled with artificial intelligence to fight it.
Read more
20 Feb 2026
Sixty percent of Indian consumers are interested in branded supplements with many preferring smaller pack sizes, according to a global survey.
Read more
19 Feb 2026
Food and drink products in Canada must now carry warning labels for high saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content – a move designed to help consumers make more informed purchasing decisions.
Read more