Ingredients Categories

News

Quality counts: Don’t be seduced by big grams in protein bars

19 Jan 2026

Interactions with other ingredients can affect protein digestibility in energy bars. We look at how brands can ensure their ‘high protein’ claims do, in fact, benefit the consumer.

Bars have emerged as one of the winners in the high-protein craze of the last few years. They offer a convenient format for packing a large amount of protein, with many delivering more than 20 grams per serving.

Quality counts: Don’t be seduced by big grams in protein bars
© iStock/MurzikNata

However, as the popularity of protein bars has surged, so has the amount of scrutiny over the quality of the nutrition they are delivering. And it has become apparent that the best bars aren’t necessarily the ones with the highest protein content.

“Protein quality isn’t just about how much protein is in a product, but how well the body can digest it and how complete its amino acid profile is,” Nichola Ludlam-Raine, dietician and author of the book How Not to Eat Ultra-Processed, told this publication.

The topic of protein quality vs quantity was investigated recently by researchers at the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences. They found that although most protein bars are labelled ‘high in protein’ based on content, their actual nutritional quality may be low.

The researchers studied 1,641 commercially available bars. Of these, 81% were able to claim ‘high protein’ under EU Regulation 1924/2006, which requires that protein is a minimum of 20% of overall energy content. But when they tested the quality of that protein in four bars, they found that all of them fell short of the Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) recommended minimum threshold for making protein quality claims.

“We believe that this research addresses a much neglected aspect of protein bars, i.e. that high protein content does not necessarily mean high protein nutritional quality,” wrote the researchers in Scientific Reports.

How to formulate a bar that contains high quality protein?

What does this mean for retailers when they are deciding which bars to stock? How can they determine which bars offer quality protein?

According to Ludlam-Raine, high quality proteins provide all the essential amino acids in proportions the body can use, and are readily digested and absorbed. As such they will generally score well on protein quality scoring systems like the Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) and the newer Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS).

“These measure both amino acid composition and digestibility, which together determine how effectively a protein contributes to human dietary needs,” she noted.

She said that animal-derived proteins such as whey, casein, milk proteins, and eggs consistently score high on these quality measures because they are complete proteins with high digestibility.

In terms of plant proteins, soy protein isolates score relatively well, whilst single plant proteins like rice or wheat tend to have lower scores due to less favourable essential amino acid profiles or lower digestibility, she explained.

Interactions with other ingredients can affect protein digestibility

So far, so good, but it starts to get complicated when proteins are incorporated into bars, as this can affect digestibility.

“When protein is included within a complex bar matrix, interactions with other ingredients – such as carbohydrates, fats, and fibre – can reduce in vitro digestibility scores compared with the same protein source tested in isolation,” explained Ludlam-Raine.

She continued: “This suggests the food form can influence the bioaccessibility of the protein’s amino acids, meaning less may ultimately be available for absorption, even if the label lists a high protein content.”

Protein quality lower ‘in bar’

Ludlam-Raine’s comments are consistent with the above-mentioned study, which found that the digestibility of all proteins was decreased by formulation into bars.

“Take whey protein and milk protein; the DIASS value of these two protein sources was drastically lowered in the bar. Both proteins have DIASS scores above 100, but in the bar they only reached around 60%. This was probably due to the presence of other ingredients such as carbohydrates, fats and fibres, which may hinder the digestibility of protein bars at the amino acid level,” lead researcher Judit Tormàsi said.

Whilst there is no escaping the fact that protein bars need additional ingredients to be palatable, this highlights the importance of looking beyond total grams of protein and considering the protein source and its digestibility within the finished product.

“The key thing to look for is a high proportion of complete, high-digestibility protein sources such as whey, milk, egg, soy, or a plant blend. Many products that combine a blend of dairy proteins and well formulated plant proteins use ingredient science to deliver better amino acid profiles and digestibility than bars relying primarily on lower quality protein inputs,” said Ludlam-Raine.

Related news

Tagatose exempt from added sugar labelling in US

Tagatose exempt from added sugar labelling in US

19 May 2026

Tagatose, a low-calorie, natural sweetener with EU-approved health claims, is now exempt from added sugar labelling in the US – a move that could see uptake scale significantly.

Read more 
Walmart revamps its ‘Great Value’ private label range

Walmart revamps its ‘Great Value’ private label range

18 May 2026

US retail giant Walmart has rebranded its flagship ‘Great Value’ range, highlighting the quality and affordability of around 10,000 private label products.

Read more 
Fairtrade International calls on industry to act for fair supply chains

Fairtrade International calls on industry to act for fair supply chains

14 May 2026

Via its Global Strategy 2026-2028, Fairtrade International is calling on the food industry to embed fairer sourcing practices and invest in long-term supplier relationships.

Read more 
NutriScore recognition has 'surged' across France

NutriScore recognition has 'surged' across France

13 May 2026

The number of consumers engaging with Europe's front-of-pack nutrient profiling system, NutriScore, is on the rise across France – the first country to scale voluntary use, finds NielsenIQ research.

Read more 
Plant-based shift: Netherlands updates national food pyramid

Plant-based shift: Netherlands updates national food pyramid

12 May 2026

The Dutch nutrition authority has updated the country's food pyramid, rebalancing animal and plant-based consumption to align with government updates to dietary guidelines.

Read more 
Which technologies can reduce damage and losses in the supply chain?

Which technologies can reduce damage and losses in the supply chain?

11 May 2026

Goods are often damaged throughout the supply chain but novel technologies – such as hyperspectral imaging, automated reject systems, and smart indicators – are reducing losses.

Read more 
What are the biggest food health trends for 2026?

What are the biggest food health trends for 2026?

7 May 2026

Protein, gut health, functional beverages, and mental wellbeing are the key health-powered trends driving innovation and growth, says Innova Market Insights.

Read more 
Biscuits and chocolate: Mondelēz targets 'resilient' categories for US and Europe growth

Biscuits and chocolate: Mondelēz targets 'resilient' categories for US and Europe growth

7 May 2026

Mondelēz International wants to bolster business further in developed markets, focusing on biscuits in the US and chocolate in Europe, as snacking continues to gain momentum globally, its CEO says.

Read more 
Nutri-Score now more compatible with NOVA processed foods classification

Nutri-Score now more compatible with NOVA processed foods classification

5 May 2026

The European front-of-pack nutrition logo, Nutri-Score, is now better aligned with the processed food classification NOVA, following a 2026 algorithm update.

Read more 
Harvard and Yuka uncover the hidden costs of cheap food

Harvard and Yuka uncover the hidden costs of cheap food

4 May 2026

The cheapest products contain 2.6 more additives and 21% more sugar than higher-priced products, according to a US study by Harvard and food scanning app Yuka.

Read more