News
A recent British Medical Journal (BMJ) review advises people to cut intake of added sugars to six teaspoons a day but industry group The Sugar Association has slammed the quality of data used in the review as “garbage”.
The review, which included 73 meta-analyses from 8,601 articles covering 83 health outcomes in adults and children, the reduction of added (“free”) sugars to around six teaspoons a day as well as limiting sugar-sweetened drinks to less than one serving a week.

According to current US dietary guidelines, no more than 200 calories should come from added sugars in a 2,000-calorie diet, which is about 12 teaspoons.
“This umbrella review shows that high dietary sugar consumption, especially intake of sugars that contain fructose, is harmfully associated with large numbers of health outcomes,” the researchers concluded.
“Evidence for the harmful associations between dietary sugar consumption and changes in body weight, ectopic fat accumulation, obesity in children, coronary heart disease, and depression seems to be more reliable than that for other outcomes.
“To change sugar consumption patterns, especially for children and adolescents, a combination of widespread public health education and policies worldwide is urgently needed.”
In a scathing response to the evidence review featured in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), the Sugar Association called into the question the methodology of the studies used as well as the timing of the publication.
“This is a review of existing evidence, and even a well-executed systematic review is only as good as the studies that are inputted. Essentially, garbage in equals garbage out,” said Courtney Gaine, president and CEO of the Sugar Association.
“Whenever conclusion statements are stronger than the actual findings and, even worse, don’t reflect the aim of the study or what the study was designed to find, it is a red flag.
© AdobeStock/C. Fish Images
“Clearly there is something fishy here, but the timing of a paper like this in the midst of the 2025 to 2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans process is not a surprise,” she added.
The review’s release comes as the US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee revisits the country’s Dietary Guidelines for 2025 to 2030 in which current guidelines recommend those two years and older keep an added sugar intake of less than 10% of their total daily calories.
For example, in a 2,000-calorie diet, no more than 200 calories should come from added sugars, which is about 12 teaspoons.
The BMJ researchers, from China’s Sichuan University and the UC Davis School of Medicine in Sacramento in the US acknowledged that existing evidence was mostly observational and of low quality – an observation picked up by the Sugar Association.
“It is known that added sugars literature suffers from significant variability when it comes to definitions, intake measurements and control of energy and other diet and lifestyle variables,” they wrote.
“The studies included in this review are primarily focused on sugar sweetened beverages, and not all sources of added sugars.
“It is clear the outcomes of studies do depend on source, which is why there is now recognition that food and beverage sources of added sugars should be viewed differently in scientific analyses.”
Generally, sugar-sweetened beverages are the largest source of added sugars, including carbonated and noncarbonated soft drinks, fruit drinks, and sports and energy drinks, the review cited.
© AdobeStock/LiliGraphie
Previous surveys have shown that consumption of sugar sweetened beverages is declining in many developed countries, although consumption levels remain high.
“While popular amongst some to proclaim that reducing added sugars (to such levels as never before seen in over the 100 years of USDA’s record-keeping) will improve health, the real-world data suggest otherwise,” Gaines highlighted.
“We’ve seen sugar consumption drop 30% since 2000 while obesity rates in adults have tripled and in children, quadrupled.”
6 Mar 2026
EFSA scientists will investigate the health risks of microplastics by 2027 – but what should food brands do in the meantime?
Read more
5 Mar 2026
British retailer Marks and Spencer has introduced 12 new products to its 'Only … Ingredients' range, as brands are advised to focus on “transparent communication”.
Read more
4 Mar 2026
Innovative sustainable animal products and plant-based alternatives can plug health and environmental concerns – but consumer willingness to pay for these products remains variable, finds an EU-funded study.
Read more
2 Mar 2026
Lidl is “setting the pace” in Europe's transition towards sustainable food systems. How did other European supermarkets score, according to Superlist Environment Europe 2026?
Read more
27 Feb 2026
For healthy indulgent products, messaging around enjoyment resonates more strongly than “guilt-free”, according to a study by EIT Food.
Read more
19 Feb 2026
Food and drink products in Canada must now carry warning labels for high saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content – a move designed to help consumers make more informed purchasing decisions.
Read more
18 Feb 2026
The UK’s largest supermarket chain has achieved its target to increase the proportion of sales from healthier products to 65% by 2025.
Read more
10 Feb 2026
The Vitafoods Europe Innovation Awards 2026 promote nutraceutical NPD and innovation. Here, some of this year’s jury members discuss what they will be looking out for.
Read more
9 Feb 2026
Using AI to manage digital energy consumption in factories is the latest strategy in manufacturers’ toolbox for sustainable operations and efficient energy use.
Read more
5 Feb 2026
Global food supply chains must adapt procurement strategies to remain resilient and sustainable, according to a World Economic Forum paper.
Read more