News
The European Nutri-Score labelling system can help young people make healthier food choices, according to a Spanish study – but one third still do not know what the label indicates.
The Nutri-Score system is an optional front-of-pack scoring label – adapted from the British Food Standards Agency (FSA) traffic light nutrition label – aimed at driving healthier food choices among consumers. It is the official nutrition logo in France, although its use is voluntary. It has also been endorsed by Belgian, Spanish, German and Dutch health authorities as well as the European Commission and the World Health Organization.
Its aim is to summarise “a set of unintelligible numbers and terms of nutritional values, located on the back of the packaging, based on a coloured logo that is easily understood by consumers,” by categorising products from a green ‘A’ to a red ‘E’, said the researchers of a recent cross-section observational survey study.
The researchers questioned 161 university students, faced for the first time with the responsibilities of living outside of the family group, in the social and contact networks of the Mediterrani University School, Barcelona.
The majority (64%) of the students surveyed did not read any labels on food products and found it difficult to identify the degree of wholesomeness of what they consume, said the authors, led by Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, from Blanquerna-Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona.
Most (72%) also admitted to buying a food product only for the information shown on the front of the packaging, a fact which did not vary among men and women.
Despite students making food purchasing choices based on such front-of-pack information, 33% did not know what the Nutri-Score label indicates.
Informed of the system, however, most of the participants (89%) indicated that the Nutri-Score label would help them to introduce healthy foods into their diet. The opinion was even more popular amongst women (94%) than men (82%).
The researchers also compared the labels of two products, one with the Nutri-Score scheme and the other with the Guideline Daily Amounts label, and found 88.8% of the students better interpreted the product labelled with Nutri-Score.
“Therefore, due to the easy interpretation of the Nutri-Score logo and the lack of other tools that help participants make healthier decisions, Nutri-Score is postulated as a good guidance system for healthier food purchase decisions.”
The researchers also recommended that new studies should be conducted in larger university student samples with regards to the Nutri-Score’s influence on purchase decisions.
Previous studies on the understanding of the Nutri-Score labelling system, as well as of other nutritional labels, are scarce, they added.
“Currently, there are few brands that include the Nutri-Score label, as it is not required,” the researchers continued.
“However, it is being adopted by more products every day, and awareness of proper nutrition is increasing.”
Overall, a total 86.9% of the students considered their diet to be normal, very health or quite healthy, while just 11.8% admitted having an unhealthy diet. The remainder did not know.
“The results showed that this perception is wrong,” said the researchers, adding: “The consumption of ultra-processed foods by the respondents is too high to consider that they have a normal or healthy diet.”
Weekly, 71% admitted to consuming soft drinks, 83% snacks, 83% nuggets, 67% pastries, and 68% alcohol. A total of 25.5% did not know the adequate or optimal amount of the daily consumption for salt and sugar.
The study also found that wrongful perceptions of a healthy diet were particularly rife among overweight students.
Of the participants, most (87.5%) had a body mass index (BMI) within normal range, though 11.2% were overweight or obese.
“Most of those who are overweight or obese perceive their diet in a distorted way, qualifying it as normal or even very healthy,” said the researchers.
“Neither sex nor age, the type of university, studies, or branches of knowledge influences how the study participants perceived their diet.”
11 Mar 2026
The EU's olive oil market is highly regulated to ensure quality, safety, and traceability – but a recent audit found control system gaps that need improving.
Read more
9 Mar 2026
Mondelēz International will need to make successful products with plant-based ingredients if it is to meet its long-term climate commitments, it says.
Read more
6 Mar 2026
EFSA scientists will investigate the health risks of microplastics by 2027 – but what should food brands do in the meantime?
Read more
5 Mar 2026
British retailer Marks and Spencer has introduced 12 new products to its 'Only … Ingredients' range, as brands are advised to focus on “transparent communication”.
Read more
2 Mar 2026
Lidl is “setting the pace” in Europe's transition towards sustainable food systems. How did other European supermarkets score, according to Superlist Environment Europe 2026?
Read more
27 Feb 2026
For healthy indulgent products, messaging around enjoyment resonates more strongly than “guilt-free”, according to a study by EIT Food.
Read more
25 Feb 2026
Dogs fed on premium, meat-rich pet food can have bigger dietary carbon footprints than their owners – but using by-products is a “highly relevant” solution for brands.
Read more
24 Feb 2026
Herbs, spices, and white powders are highly at risk of food fraud – but the industry is embracing food fingerprinting coupled with artificial intelligence to fight it.
Read more
20 Feb 2026
Sixty percent of Indian consumers are interested in branded supplements with many preferring smaller pack sizes, according to a global survey.
Read more
19 Feb 2026
Food and drink products in Canada must now carry warning labels for high saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content – a move designed to help consumers make more informed purchasing decisions.
Read more