News
The European Nutri-Score labelling system can help young people make healthier food choices, according to a Spanish study – but one third still do not know what the label indicates.
The Nutri-Score system is an optional front-of-pack scoring label – adapted from the British Food Standards Agency (FSA) traffic light nutrition label – aimed at driving healthier food choices among consumers. It is the official nutrition logo in France, although its use is voluntary. It has also been endorsed by Belgian, Spanish, German and Dutch health authorities as well as the European Commission and the World Health Organization.
Its aim is to summarise “a set of unintelligible numbers and terms of nutritional values, located on the back of the packaging, based on a coloured logo that is easily understood by consumers,” by categorising products from a green ‘A’ to a red ‘E’, said the researchers of a recent cross-section observational survey study.
The researchers questioned 161 university students, faced for the first time with the responsibilities of living outside of the family group, in the social and contact networks of the Mediterrani University School, Barcelona.
The majority (64%) of the students surveyed did not read any labels on food products and found it difficult to identify the degree of wholesomeness of what they consume, said the authors, led by Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, from Blanquerna-Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona.
Most (72%) also admitted to buying a food product only for the information shown on the front of the packaging, a fact which did not vary among men and women.
Despite students making food purchasing choices based on such front-of-pack information, 33% did not know what the Nutri-Score label indicates.
Informed of the system, however, most of the participants (89%) indicated that the Nutri-Score label would help them to introduce healthy foods into their diet. The opinion was even more popular amongst women (94%) than men (82%).
The researchers also compared the labels of two products, one with the Nutri-Score scheme and the other with the Guideline Daily Amounts label, and found 88.8% of the students better interpreted the product labelled with Nutri-Score.
“Therefore, due to the easy interpretation of the Nutri-Score logo and the lack of other tools that help participants make healthier decisions, Nutri-Score is postulated as a good guidance system for healthier food purchase decisions.”
The researchers also recommended that new studies should be conducted in larger university student samples with regards to the Nutri-Score’s influence on purchase decisions.
Previous studies on the understanding of the Nutri-Score labelling system, as well as of other nutritional labels, are scarce, they added.
“Currently, there are few brands that include the Nutri-Score label, as it is not required,” the researchers continued.
“However, it is being adopted by more products every day, and awareness of proper nutrition is increasing.”
Overall, a total 86.9% of the students considered their diet to be normal, very health or quite healthy, while just 11.8% admitted having an unhealthy diet. The remainder did not know.
“The results showed that this perception is wrong,” said the researchers, adding: “The consumption of ultra-processed foods by the respondents is too high to consider that they have a normal or healthy diet.”
Weekly, 71% admitted to consuming soft drinks, 83% snacks, 83% nuggets, 67% pastries, and 68% alcohol. A total of 25.5% did not know the adequate or optimal amount of the daily consumption for salt and sugar.
The study also found that wrongful perceptions of a healthy diet were particularly rife among overweight students.
Of the participants, most (87.5%) had a body mass index (BMI) within normal range, though 11.2% were overweight or obese.
“Most of those who are overweight or obese perceive their diet in a distorted way, qualifying it as normal or even very healthy,” said the researchers.
“Neither sex nor age, the type of university, studies, or branches of knowledge influences how the study participants perceived their diet.”
21 Nov 2025
The UK Government has announced a new package of measures designed to reverse the nation’s childhood obesity epidemic following the release of statistics revealing the scale of the crisis.
Read more
18 Nov 2025
Gen Z and millennial consumers’ preferences for transparency, functionality, and purpose are “redefining the very nature of consumption itself”, says SPINS.
Read more
10 Nov 2025
Ingredients companies are being urged to enter “a new era of partnership and innovation” following the launch of the industry’s first non-UPF verification scheme.
Read more
5 Nov 2025
Some popular protein bars contain more fat, carbs, and/or sugars than claimed on their labels, independent nutrition testing reveals.
Read more
27 Oct 2025
Promoting the protein content of meat-free products is a more effective sales strategy than adding carbon labels, a study of UK bakery chain Greggs suggests.
Read more
17 Oct 2025
Supplement consumers want specific health benefits that focus on prevention and personalisation, according to data from HealthFocus International.
Read more
10 Oct 2025
Climate change, geopolitics, regulations, and demand for sustainable products are pushing up food fraud and adulteration risks, warns a world-leading food fraud expert.
Read more
2 Oct 2025
Nutrient-dense claims are rising as consumers reject the “empty calories” of UPFs in favour of products that provide meaningful nutrition with every calorie, Mintel data shows.
Read more
30 Sep 2025
Industry associations have expressed mixed reactions to new policy directions on health and nutrition under the Make America Health Again (MAHA) banner.
Read more
22 Sep 2025
The presence of a front-of-pack Eco-Score label improves consumers' accuracy in identifying sustainable food products from 52% to 72%, a study suggests.
Read more