News
The European Nutri-Score labelling system can help young people make healthier food choices, according to a Spanish study – but one third still do not know what the label indicates.
The Nutri-Score system is an optional front-of-pack scoring label – adapted from the British Food Standards Agency (FSA) traffic light nutrition label – aimed at driving healthier food choices among consumers. It is the official nutrition logo in France, although its use is voluntary. It has also been endorsed by Belgian, Spanish, German and Dutch health authorities as well as the European Commission and the World Health Organization.
Its aim is to summarise “a set of unintelligible numbers and terms of nutritional values, located on the back of the packaging, based on a coloured logo that is easily understood by consumers,” by categorising products from a green ‘A’ to a red ‘E’, said the researchers of a recent cross-section observational survey study.
The researchers questioned 161 university students, faced for the first time with the responsibilities of living outside of the family group, in the social and contact networks of the Mediterrani University School, Barcelona.
The majority (64%) of the students surveyed did not read any labels on food products and found it difficult to identify the degree of wholesomeness of what they consume, said the authors, led by Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón, from Blanquerna-Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona.
Most (72%) also admitted to buying a food product only for the information shown on the front of the packaging, a fact which did not vary among men and women.
Despite students making food purchasing choices based on such front-of-pack information, 33% did not know what the Nutri-Score label indicates.
Informed of the system, however, most of the participants (89%) indicated that the Nutri-Score label would help them to introduce healthy foods into their diet. The opinion was even more popular amongst women (94%) than men (82%).
The researchers also compared the labels of two products, one with the Nutri-Score scheme and the other with the Guideline Daily Amounts label, and found 88.8% of the students better interpreted the product labelled with Nutri-Score.
“Therefore, due to the easy interpretation of the Nutri-Score logo and the lack of other tools that help participants make healthier decisions, Nutri-Score is postulated as a good guidance system for healthier food purchase decisions.”
The researchers also recommended that new studies should be conducted in larger university student samples with regards to the Nutri-Score’s influence on purchase decisions.
Previous studies on the understanding of the Nutri-Score labelling system, as well as of other nutritional labels, are scarce, they added.
“Currently, there are few brands that include the Nutri-Score label, as it is not required,” the researchers continued.
“However, it is being adopted by more products every day, and awareness of proper nutrition is increasing.”
Overall, a total 86.9% of the students considered their diet to be normal, very health or quite healthy, while just 11.8% admitted having an unhealthy diet. The remainder did not know.
“The results showed that this perception is wrong,” said the researchers, adding: “The consumption of ultra-processed foods by the respondents is too high to consider that they have a normal or healthy diet.”
Weekly, 71% admitted to consuming soft drinks, 83% snacks, 83% nuggets, 67% pastries, and 68% alcohol. A total of 25.5% did not know the adequate or optimal amount of the daily consumption for salt and sugar.
The study also found that wrongful perceptions of a healthy diet were particularly rife among overweight students.
Of the participants, most (87.5%) had a body mass index (BMI) within normal range, though 11.2% were overweight or obese.
“Most of those who are overweight or obese perceive their diet in a distorted way, qualifying it as normal or even very healthy,” said the researchers.
“Neither sex nor age, the type of university, studies, or branches of knowledge influences how the study participants perceived their diet.”
20 Apr 2026
Honey origin labelling, higher fruit content for jams, and new categories for reduced-sugar juices: What must brands do to comply with the EU Breakfast Directive?
Read more
17 Apr 2026
UK pet food startup Years designs its premium meals based on a dog’s breed, life stage, and health, using wholefood recipes and clear plastic packaging.
Read more
14 Apr 2026
Emissions-reduction technologies can help global manufacturers lower their environmental impact while increasing operational efficiency and making savings.
Read more
13 Apr 2026
EFSA has confirmed sucralose cannot be used in most bakery applications. So, which sweeteners can manufacturers of healthy indulgent baked goods use?
Read more
9 Apr 2026
Bold, relevant, and agile disruptor brands, such as Olly and Poppi are reshaping consumer packaged goods (CPG) and driving growth in stagnant areas – reframing everything about the categories they are showing up in, say experts.
Read more
6 Apr 2026
Automation is helping manufacturers reduce bottlenecks but it also comes with risks. Successful brands will have clear risk management strategies.
Read more
1 Apr 2026
Danone is calling on government and industry stakeholders to develop a unified definition of “healthy” in order to reduce consumer confusion and encourage reformulation.
Read more
26 Mar 2026
Oatly has lost a long legal battle with the UK dairy industry and cannot use the term “Post milk generation” in its marketing.
Read more
23 Mar 2026
US food brands can now make a “no artificial colours” claim when using petroleum-free colours – even if the colourings they do use are manufactured synthetically.
Read more
19 Mar 2026
The EU looks set to ban 31 animal-associated names for plant-based products – but common terms such as burger, sausage, and nuggets will remain permitted.
Read more