News

USDA expands its definition of nitrates

15 Jan 2021

The Food Safety and Inspection Service of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) will expand the definition of nitrates in May 2021 to prohibit products using any source of nitrates from using the statements “No Nitrate or Nitrite Added” and “Uncured.” Sources of nitrates, both synthetic and natural, will be considered curing agents.

This new ruling is in response to a petition sent by the Center for Science in the Public Interest requesting the governmental agency to revise its position on nitrates as the current labeling system is misleading. In the petition, the agency asked for the USDA to require labeling non-synthetic sources of nitrates, such as celery powder, as curing agents; require nitrate ingredients to be listed on the nutrition panel; require a disclosure such as “Nitrates or nitrites added” on all products prepared with any sources of nitrates; and prohibit the statements, “No Nitrate or Nitrite Added” and “Uncured,” on products that have been processed using any source of nitrates.

USDA expands its definition of nitrates

While several of these requests were granted, the USDA is not obliging manufacturers to disclose of the use of nitrates when non-synthetic sources are used. Instead, the agency said that the amended definitions of “cured” and “uncured” will clarify the current confusion around the use of nitrate sources.

Such sweeping changes to the definition of nitrates will certainly affect the food industry as many manufacturers have sought to clean up their food labels and erase the term nitrates from them by using vegetal-based nitrate substitutes. However, now that these sources are considered nitrates, companies will once again have to redesign their labels or reformulate their products if they wish to keep nitrates from appearing on labels.

Despite the push to remove the term from visibility, nitrates are an important addition to many products, particularly processed meats, as they act as preservatives that prevent the growth of dangerous bacteria. Despite their efficacy, consumers have largely taken the stance that they prefer to not have nitrates in their food. There have been studies showing that nitrates lead to the body developing carcinogens; a fact that was noted in the petition by the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

Pressure from consumers has led to manufacturers working to devise alternative preservation solutions. While natural ingredients like sage, salt and vinegar are widely used, they remain less popular than nitrate solutions for preservation.

With nearly half of consumers searching for “no nitrates added” labels when purchasing products, according to a 2019 Consumer Reports survey, manufacturers will have to consider both the advantages and disadvantages of continuing to rely on nitrates to preserve products.

Related news

EU Breakfast Directive: What food brands must do before June deadline

EU Breakfast Directive: What food brands must do before June deadline

20 Apr 2026

Honey origin labelling, higher fruit content for jams, and new categories for reduced-sugar juices: What must brands do to comply with the EU Breakfast Directive?

Read more 
Dog food brand shakes up sector with ‘human-quality’ meat

Dog food brand shakes up sector with ‘human-quality’ meat

17 Apr 2026

UK pet food startup Years designs its premium meals based on a dog’s breed, life stage, and health, using wholefood recipes and clear plastic packaging.

Read more 
Emissions-reduction technologies can help brands hit green goals

Emissions-reduction technologies can help brands hit green goals

14 Apr 2026

Emissions-reduction technologies can help global manufacturers lower their environmental impact while increasing operational efficiency and making savings.

Read more 
Securing sweetness in bakery, without the sweetener effect

Securing sweetness in bakery, without the sweetener effect

13 Apr 2026

EFSA has confirmed sucralose cannot be used in most bakery applications. So, which sweeteners can manufacturers of healthy indulgent baked goods use?

Read more 
The rise of CPG disruptor brands

The rise of CPG disruptor brands

9 Apr 2026

Bold, relevant, and agile disruptor brands, such as Olly and Poppi are reshaping consumer packaged goods (CPG) and driving growth in stagnant areas – reframing everything about the categories they are showing up in, say experts.

Read more 
Rising automation requires clear risk management strategy

Rising automation requires clear risk management strategy

6 Apr 2026

Automation is helping manufacturers reduce bottlenecks but it also comes with risks. Successful brands will have clear risk management strategies.

Read more 
Danone calls for unified definition of ‘healthy’

Danone calls for unified definition of ‘healthy’

1 Apr 2026

Danone is calling on government and industry stakeholders to develop a unified definition of “healthy” in order to reduce consumer confusion and encourage reformulation.

Read more 
Oatly loses legal battle over ‘Post milk generation’ claim

Oatly loses legal battle over ‘Post milk generation’ claim

26 Mar 2026

Oatly has lost a long legal battle with the UK dairy industry and cannot use the term “Post milk generation” in its marketing.

Read more 
FDA broadens scope for ‘no artificial colours’ claim

FDA broadens scope for ‘no artificial colours’ claim

23 Mar 2026

US food brands can now make a “no artificial colours” claim when using petroleum-free colours – even if the colourings they do use are manufactured synthetically.

Read more 
EU to ban 31 meat names for plant-based foods

EU to ban 31 meat names for plant-based foods

19 Mar 2026

The EU looks set to ban 31 animal-associated names for plant-based products – but common terms such as burger, sausage, and nuggets will remain permitted.

Read more