News

How will changing EU packaging rules affect the food and beverage industry?

17 Apr 2025

Food and beverage manufacturers operating in the European Union (EU) face significant packaging changes following the introduction of the updated Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR).

The legislation, which came into effect in February, introduces mandatory design and material standards aimed at reducing packaging waste, increasing recyclability, and shifting end-of-life costs on to producers.

How will changing EU packaging rules affect the food and beverage industry?
© iStock/MTStock Studio

From 12 August 2026, all companies placing packaged products on the EU market must comply with the new rules. The regulation applies across the entire supply chain – from primary packaging used by food manufacturers to retail, transport, and takeaway formats.

The European Commission is expected to issue further technical guidance ahead of the 2026 enforcement date.

A separate Circular Economy Act, scheduled for 2026, may introduce additional packaging-related measures, including incentives for reuse systems and circular materials.

Recyclability by design and extended producer responsibility

One of the central changes under the PPWR is the requirement that all packaging must be recyclable by 2030, both in design and practice. This will force manufacturers to eliminate complex multi-material formats, prioritise mono-material structures, and move away from hard-to-recycle plastics such as flexible laminates and black plastic.

Manufacturers must also ensure that plastic packaging meets minimum recycled content thresholds, which vary by polymer type. Some formats, including certain single-use plastic wraps for fresh produce and small portion packs, face outright restrictions.

The regulation reinforces extended producer responsibility (EPR), shifting the cost of collection, sorting, and recycling from municipalities to manufacturers. Producers will be required to register in each member state where they place packaged products on the market and will be charged fees based on recyclability and eco-design performance.

According to Marcelo Brull, sustainability manager at Informa Markets, this introduces a fundamental shift in how packaging is evaluated.

“What’s new is the link between how packaging is designed and how much producers pay: companies that invest in more recyclable or reusable packaging will likely see lower EPR fees. That’s a big incentive shift,” he said.

Brull emphasised that the regulation marks a transition from voluntary design targets to enforceable obligations across the bloc.

Impacts on food-contact materials and product formats

For food manufacturers, the new rules are expected to affect a wide range of packaging formats and may require changes to both material selection and structural design.

To comply with 80% recyclability by weight targets, companies will need to rework formats such as flexible sachets, film-sealed trays, and multi-layer laminates, which are currently not recyclable at scale. Brull noted that some of the biggest hurdles will be technical.

He said: “Many food and drink products rely on complex, multi-material packaging to preserve shelf life or meet safety standards, and those materials are often not recyclable. Even if packaging is technically recyclable, it might not be processed everywhere due to uneven infrastructure across member states.”

The regulation also bans the use of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in food-contact materials above certain thresholds. These chemicals, used to provide water and grease resistance, are being phased out due to environmental persistence and potential health risks.

In addition, the law mandates that e-commerce and transport packaging formats must not exceed 50% empty space. This is expected to impact secondary and tertiary packaging for online grocery orders, shelf-ready units, and promotional multi-packs.

Labelling is another area of change. Companies will be required to provide recyclability and reuse instructions through standardised EU-wide labels or QR codes. These will need to be legible and accessible to end users and linked to approved collection and reuse systems.

Operational and market implications

Manufacturers are advised to begin packaging portfolio reviews ahead of the 2026 application date to assess compliance risks. Materials such as mono-material polyethylene, polypropylene, moulded fibre, and compostable bioplastics may become more prominent, though trade-offs in cost, availability, and performance remain.

Producers will also need to implement systems for data tracking, as EPR fees will be based on material types, weight, and recyclability scores. Many companies currently lack the infrastructure to capture and report this data across multiple national markets.

“Companies will need to improve how they track and report packaging data, which isn’t always in place nowadays,” said Brull. “There’s also the branding challenge. Changing packaging formats while staying true to your visual identity isn’t always easy.”

While short-term cost increases are likely, Brull noted that early compliance may provide competitive advantages in the long term.

“Costs will definitely rise in the short term, particularly for companies needing to reexamine their packaging portfolios... But over time, these investments can drive efficiency and resilience, and companies that act early may avoid higher costs later or even gain a competitive edge,” he said.

Related news

UK Government overhauls childhood obesity strategy

UK Government overhauls childhood obesity strategy

21 Nov 2025

The UK Government has announced a new package of measures designed to reverse the nation’s childhood obesity epidemic following the release of statistics revealing the scale of the crisis.

Read more 
How younger consumers are redefining ingredient choices and rejecting brand loyalty

How younger consumers are redefining ingredient choices and rejecting brand loyalty

18 Nov 2025

Gen Z and millennial consumers’ preferences for transparency, functionality, and purpose are “redefining the very nature of consumption itself”, says SPINS.

Read more 
New UPF standard hoped to offer consumers ‘coherence and clarity’

New UPF standard hoped to offer consumers ‘coherence and clarity’

10 Nov 2025

Ingredients companies are being urged to enter “a new era of partnership and innovation” following the launch of the industry’s first non-UPF verification scheme.

Read more 
Ingredient quantities mislabelled on popular protein bars, independent tests show

Ingredient quantities mislabelled on popular protein bars, independent tests show

5 Nov 2025

Some popular protein bars contain more fat, carbs, and/or sugars than claimed on their labels, independent nutrition testing reveals.

Read more 
Does promoting protein content push up plant-based sales?

Does promoting protein content push up plant-based sales?

27 Oct 2025

Promoting the protein content of meat-free products is a more effective sales strategy than adding carbon labels, a study of UK bakery chain Greggs suggests.

Read more 
Supplement shoppers seek storytelling and science-backed suppliers

Supplement shoppers seek storytelling and science-backed suppliers

17 Oct 2025

Supplement consumers want specific health benefits that focus on prevention and personalisation, according to data from HealthFocus International.

Read more 
Food fraud risks rise as brands fight economic and environmental headwinds

Food fraud risks rise as brands fight economic and environmental headwinds

10 Oct 2025

Climate change, geopolitics, regulations, and demand for sustainable products are pushing up food fraud and adulteration risks, warns a world-leading food fraud expert.

Read more 
The growing appeal of nutrient-dense food claims

The growing appeal of nutrient-dense food claims

2 Oct 2025

Nutrient-dense claims are rising as consumers reject the “empty calories” of UPFs in favour of products that provide meaningful nutrition with every calorie, Mintel data shows.

Read more 
What does MAHA mean for the US nutraceutical industry?

What does MAHA mean for the US nutraceutical industry?

30 Sep 2025

Industry associations have expressed mixed reactions to new policy directions on health and nutrition under the Make America Health Again (MAHA) banner.

Read more 
Eco-Score labels improve consumer identification of sustainable foods

Eco-Score labels improve consumer identification of sustainable foods

22 Sep 2025

The presence of a front-of-pack Eco-Score label improves consumers' accuracy in identifying sustainable food products from 52% to 72%, a study suggests.

Read more