News
Sequestration of carbon into soil has almost the same potential to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as the use of wind or solar power and provides farmers with an opportunity equal to that of reforestation strategies, according to Berry Marttin of Rabobank.
Speaking at the recent F&A Next conference in Wageningen, the Netherlands, Marttin told delegates that the most recent United Nations IPCC report provides some “very interesting” reading for the food supply chain as it is the first time that the report recognised carbon sequestration via soil.
“They said that, actually, the opportunity for sequestration of carbon by farmers is almost as big as wind. Almost as big as solar,” he noted. “It's very important so that we start thinking about this huge opportunity.”
However, Marttin noted that despite appearing in the most recent IPCC report, the guidelines on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions of the current GHG Protocol don't mention sequestration of carbon from land, which is causing an issue for companies looking to reduce emissions and hit net zero through soil sequestration.
“It's just not there,” he said. “If you have a bank right now, like us [at Rabobank], and you talk about your finance emissions, we cannot net for this.”
“Something is very wrong here,” he warned.
However, Marttin predicted that the current paradoxical situation will change in the future, and that as a result banks, investors, and farmers will begin to think “not just about the food production value of farmland, but also the sequestration potential of that farm”.
He noted that while most major retailers and supermarket chains have begun to make commitments against Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, looking at the value chain and Scope 3 emissions will be the next major challenge.
“Your Scope 1 and 2 actually don’t matter,” he said. “The real thing is, 97% of all emissions is actually Scope 3.”
“As a supermarket, to say you are going to be carbon neutral on Scope 1 and 2, actually it is not really relevant,” he said. “The question is, what are you going to do with your value chain? How are you going to turn around and say, ‘Value chain, I need to go carbon neutral’?”
Marttin cited commitments being made by UK supermarkets as leading the way in this area, noting that 75% have already made commitments to reducing Scope 3 emissions. He added that when it comes to Scope 3 emissions, 70% of the emissions are coming from ‘before the farm gate’.
“So, where are they going to look at? Who has to deliver?” he questioned. “It's really farming.”
The Rabobank board member said the major opportunity to truly decarbonize the food supply chain will only ever happen if solutions are found to get farmers moving towards decarbonization and carbon sequestration.
However, he noted that farmers see no value or gain in moving towards these solutions.
“When do you move?” he questioned. “When you make money.”
“Why should I move if I get nothing for it?” he said. “Why should I invest now, if I'm not going to get any money for that? My neighbour doesn't invest, and then is going to have a bigger cash flow than I have.”
He suggested that farmers will begin to explore the potential of ‘carbon farming’ as the pressure to decarbonise the economy continues to grow, and as the price of ‘carbon’ goes up.
Indeed, with a current price of around $25 USD per tonne of carbon captured, and the potential for capturing up to two tonnes of carbon per hectare per year, there is an opportunity for farmers to begin to explore soil sequestration.
“You have an opportunity of extra cash flow on the piece of land,” said Marttin. “If carbon is going to go to $200 or $300 [per tonne], which many of us expect, then imagine the beautiful cash flow.”
“This is where it's going to happen,” he said. “It's a huge opportunity.”
20 Apr 2026
Honey origin labelling, higher fruit content for jams, and new categories for reduced-sugar juices: What must brands do to comply with the EU Breakfast Directive?
Read more
17 Apr 2026
UK pet food startup Years designs its premium meals based on a dog’s breed, life stage, and health, using wholefood recipes and clear plastic packaging.
Read more
14 Apr 2026
Emissions-reduction technologies can help global manufacturers lower their environmental impact while increasing operational efficiency and making savings.
Read more
13 Apr 2026
EFSA has confirmed sucralose cannot be used in most bakery applications. So, which sweeteners can manufacturers of healthy indulgent baked goods use?
Read more
9 Apr 2026
Bold, relevant, and agile disruptor brands, such as Olly and Poppi are reshaping consumer packaged goods (CPG) and driving growth in stagnant areas – reframing everything about the categories they are showing up in, say experts.
Read more
6 Apr 2026
Automation is helping manufacturers reduce bottlenecks but it also comes with risks. Successful brands will have clear risk management strategies.
Read more
1 Apr 2026
Danone is calling on government and industry stakeholders to develop a unified definition of “healthy” in order to reduce consumer confusion and encourage reformulation.
Read more
26 Mar 2026
Oatly has lost a long legal battle with the UK dairy industry and cannot use the term “Post milk generation” in its marketing.
Read more
23 Mar 2026
US food brands can now make a “no artificial colours” claim when using petroleum-free colours – even if the colourings they do use are manufactured synthetically.
Read more
19 Mar 2026
The EU looks set to ban 31 animal-associated names for plant-based products – but common terms such as burger, sausage, and nuggets will remain permitted.
Read more