News
The lucrative US energy drinks market is set to reach $21 billion by 2026, as rapidly increasing demand for energy drinks leads to a continued shake-up of the CPG marketplace, say experts.
Rapid growth of the US energy drinks market is fuelling a ‘game of musical chairs’ between brands and distribution partners, warns Joshua Schall, owner and president of JS Consulting.

The United States energy drinks market was valued at $14.3 billion USD in 2020 and is forecast to hit $21 bn by 2026, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.9% predicted as consumer demand for healthy and functional energy continues to grow, according to a recent report by ResearchAndMarkets.
“It cannot be stated enough, just how important the energy category is – and will continue to be – within the beverage world,” said Schall in a recent video analysis on YouTube.
“Change is really the only constant in life, especially when we’re talking about the energy drinks category,” he noted. “I almost guarantee more large mergers and acquisitions will happen, that will inevitably cause further disruption to the category.”
PepsiCo’s recent $550 million investment in fitness energy drinks company Celsius Holdings, as part of a deal that will see the PepsiCo gain 8.5% ownership of Celsius and forge a long-term strategic distribution arrangement, came just days after its previous distribution deal with Bang Energy came to an end.
In April 2020, Bang Energy entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with PepsiCo, which saw the Pepsi become the exclusive distributor for Bang in the US. However, the deal quickly turned sour, with Bang Energy owner Vital Pharmaceuticals Inc (VPX) filing a lawsuit that accused PepsiCo of intimidation tactics and of ‘gross misconduct’ in the distribution of Bang.
Bang Energy CEO Jack Owoc said all disputes with PepsiCo had been fully settled and resolved at the time that the deal ended.
“Our primary objective is to effectuate a smooth transition that best serves both Bang Energy’s and PepsiCo’s highly valued retail customers,” he added.
Schall added that after the announcement that PepsiCo and Bang Energy would end its partnership, it was clear that PepsiCo would need to seek another strategic partner or potential M&A transaction to fill its open energy drink slot within its distribution system.
He noted that Celsius was the most impactful and disruptive deal for PepsiCo and the wider energy drinks market, adding that the fact that Celsius is defined as being ‘healthy’ and ‘functional’ in the consumer mind means it is more differentiated than the other PepsiCo energy drink offerings.
“The fact is that the Celsius consumer does not cross over much with the Rockstar Energy or Mountain Dew Energy offerings,” he added. “That lessens cannibalisation risks that were more pronounced with Bang Energy.”
© AdobeStock/Steve Cukrov
Continued shake-up: GHOST Energy to benefit?
Schall also suggested that the deal between PepsiCo and Celsius will lead to an inevitable market shake-up with direct store delivery (DSD) partners, as they look to replace the Celsius brands being taken into the new deal.
Indeed, he predicts that the deal between PepsiCo and Celsius means that the company’s former distribution partner Bang Energy will have a somewhat easier time re-securing some of the original DSD partnerships it lost in 2020 when it entered into its now defunct agreement with PepsiCo, while C4 Energy and Alani Nu may also see further growth opportunities as DSD partners look to reshuffle offerings.
“Arguably the biggest indirect winner of the PepsiCo and Celsius Holdings deal is GHOST Energy,” said Schall, noting that a lot of DSD partners that Celsius will be forced to leave are part of AB InBev.
“AB InBev just so happens to be the joint venture partner on the GHOST Energy product,” he said, adding that GHOST has quickly become the fastest growing energy drink in the US market.
“With Celsius Holdings leaving those AB InBev DSD partners that were shared by both brands, even more attention and resources will be given to GHOST Energy,” he suggested.
Set Ingredients Network as a 'Preferred Source' to get quicker access to the news you value.
2 Sep 2026
Consumers see skimpflation – reducing the quality of ingredients due to rising costs – as more unfair than shrinkflation, making it a risky strategy according to recent research.
Read more
31 Aug 2026
Britain was the only country to record grocery inflation above 2%, according to NielsenIQ data that compared Europe’s five biggest grocery markets from February to May 2026.
Read more
27 Aug 2026
Global food systems are failing to meet 2030 targets across indicators including health, environment, and resilience, according to a report co-authored by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).
Read more
20 Aug 2026
Herbal and botanical innovation in China's drinks market continues to grow, with ingredients like astragalus root, ginger, and ginseng in the spotlight – and focus shifting far beyond refreshment.
Read more
19 Aug 2026
The typical cost of US shoppers’ barbecue baskets has risen by 12% over the past year – the fastest annual rise in a decade, figures from The Economist show.
Read more
12 Aug 2026
Functional beverage interest in the US is gaining important ground as consumers now expect function rather than see it as "nice to have", and there are clear market gaps for growth, according to Spate.
Read more
11 Aug 2026
Craft chocolate brand Manam Chocolate is investing in local expansion and supply chain innovation throughout India as it works to build out the premium reputation of its locally produced cacao products.
Read more
6 Aug 2026
Food and beverage companies are increasingly turning to digital twins to optimise and automate manufacturing processes, but opportunities stretch far beyond this, say experts.
Read more
4 Aug 2026
Hungarian zero-waste startup Secon Taste is turning surplus food into upcycled snacks such as fibre-packed granola, instant porridge, and a circular coffee-tasting box.
Read more
3 Aug 2026
Codex Alimentarius has adopted its first global guidance on when to use “may contain” allergen warnings, setting thresholds intended to stop the label being used as blanket legal cover.
Read more