News
The lucrative US energy drinks market is set to reach $21 billion by 2026, as rapidly increasing demand for energy drinks leads to a continued shake-up of the CPG marketplace, say experts.
Rapid growth of the US energy drinks market is fuelling a ‘game of musical chairs’ between brands and distribution partners, warns Joshua Schall, owner and president of JS Consulting.

The United States energy drinks market was valued at $14.3 billion USD in 2020 and is forecast to hit $21 bn by 2026, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.9% predicted as consumer demand for healthy and functional energy continues to grow, according to a recent report by ResearchAndMarkets.
“It cannot be stated enough, just how important the energy category is – and will continue to be – within the beverage world,” said Schall in a recent video analysis on YouTube.
“Change is really the only constant in life, especially when we’re talking about the energy drinks category,” he noted. “I almost guarantee more large mergers and acquisitions will happen, that will inevitably cause further disruption to the category.”
PepsiCo’s recent $550 million investment in fitness energy drinks company Celsius Holdings, as part of a deal that will see the PepsiCo gain 8.5% ownership of Celsius and forge a long-term strategic distribution arrangement, came just days after its previous distribution deal with Bang Energy came to an end.
In April 2020, Bang Energy entered into an exclusive distribution agreement with PepsiCo, which saw the Pepsi become the exclusive distributor for Bang in the US. However, the deal quickly turned sour, with Bang Energy owner Vital Pharmaceuticals Inc (VPX) filing a lawsuit that accused PepsiCo of intimidation tactics and of ‘gross misconduct’ in the distribution of Bang.
Bang Energy CEO Jack Owoc said all disputes with PepsiCo had been fully settled and resolved at the time that the deal ended.
“Our primary objective is to effectuate a smooth transition that best serves both Bang Energy’s and PepsiCo’s highly valued retail customers,” he added.
Schall added that after the announcement that PepsiCo and Bang Energy would end its partnership, it was clear that PepsiCo would need to seek another strategic partner or potential M&A transaction to fill its open energy drink slot within its distribution system.
He noted that Celsius was the most impactful and disruptive deal for PepsiCo and the wider energy drinks market, adding that the fact that Celsius is defined as being ‘healthy’ and ‘functional’ in the consumer mind means it is more differentiated than the other PepsiCo energy drink offerings.
“The fact is that the Celsius consumer does not cross over much with the Rockstar Energy or Mountain Dew Energy offerings,” he added. “That lessens cannibalisation risks that were more pronounced with Bang Energy.”
© AdobeStock/Steve Cukrov
Continued shake-up: GHOST Energy to benefit?
Schall also suggested that the deal between PepsiCo and Celsius will lead to an inevitable market shake-up with direct store delivery (DSD) partners, as they look to replace the Celsius brands being taken into the new deal.
Indeed, he predicts that the deal between PepsiCo and Celsius means that the company’s former distribution partner Bang Energy will have a somewhat easier time re-securing some of the original DSD partnerships it lost in 2020 when it entered into its now defunct agreement with PepsiCo, while C4 Energy and Alani Nu may also see further growth opportunities as DSD partners look to reshuffle offerings.
“Arguably the biggest indirect winner of the PepsiCo and Celsius Holdings deal is GHOST Energy,” said Schall, noting that a lot of DSD partners that Celsius will be forced to leave are part of AB InBev.
“AB InBev just so happens to be the joint venture partner on the GHOST Energy product,” he said, adding that GHOST has quickly become the fastest growing energy drink in the US market.
“With Celsius Holdings leaving those AB InBev DSD partners that were shared by both brands, even more attention and resources will be given to GHOST Energy,” he suggested.
6 Mar 2026
EFSA scientists will investigate the health risks of microplastics by 2027 – but what should food brands do in the meantime?
Read more
5 Mar 2026
British retailer Marks and Spencer has introduced 12 new products to its 'Only … Ingredients' range, as brands are advised to focus on “transparent communication”.
Read more
4 Mar 2026
Innovative sustainable animal products and plant-based alternatives can plug health and environmental concerns – but consumer willingness to pay for these products remains variable, finds an EU-funded study.
Read more
2 Mar 2026
Lidl is “setting the pace” in Europe's transition towards sustainable food systems. How did other European supermarkets score, according to Superlist Environment Europe 2026?
Read more
27 Feb 2026
For healthy indulgent products, messaging around enjoyment resonates more strongly than “guilt-free”, according to a study by EIT Food.
Read more
19 Feb 2026
Food and drink products in Canada must now carry warning labels for high saturated fat, sugar, and sodium content – a move designed to help consumers make more informed purchasing decisions.
Read more
18 Feb 2026
The UK’s largest supermarket chain has achieved its target to increase the proportion of sales from healthier products to 65% by 2025.
Read more
10 Feb 2026
The Vitafoods Europe Innovation Awards 2026 promote nutraceutical NPD and innovation. Here, some of this year’s jury members discuss what they will be looking out for.
Read more
9 Feb 2026
Using AI to manage digital energy consumption in factories is the latest strategy in manufacturers’ toolbox for sustainable operations and efficient energy use.
Read more
5 Feb 2026
Global food supply chains must adapt procurement strategies to remain resilient and sustainable, according to a World Economic Forum paper.
Read more