News
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is calling on the US government to create policies that focus on less sugar, not different sugar.
In July, President Donald Trump made headlines by announcing that Coca-Cola would start sweetening its products with cane sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup.

The switch, celebrated by Secretary Kennedy as a win, was met with a post on Truth Social from Trump that read: “This will be a very good move by them – you’ll see. It’s just better!”
Following the endorsement, the CSPI called on the Trump administration to lower the amount of sugar in food and drink formulations rather than opting for alternative sugars.
“Cane sugar may suit the President’s taste, but nutrition scientists widely agree that swapping one type of sugar for another will do nothing to improve health,” it said.
On 24 July, the CSPI wrote to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to highlight various policies that would make real progress in lowering added sugars in the American diet.
“We believe that the Trump administration should exercise its authority to help Americans consume less sugar, not different sugar,” Alla Hill, senior science policy associate for the CSPI, told Ingredients Network.
Research findings indicate that most consumers across all age groups routinely consume high amounts of added sugars considerably above the recommended intake limit.
In 2025, the FDA updated its definition of “healthy”, placing limits on added sugars, saturated fats, and sodium. The agency now requires food contents to contain a minimum amount of recommended food groups and sub-groups like vegetables, fruits, dairy, protein foods, and whole grains, which contain various nutrients.
Healthier alternatives and better-for-you categories are growing in the US as part of manufacturers’ drive towards balancing consumers’ want for permissible indulgence with healthfulness.
“Consuming excessive amounts of added sugar in foods sweetened with corn syrup is just as harmful to one’s health as consuming excessive amounts of added sugar in foods sweetened with cane sugar, honey, maple syrup, or any other added sugar,” said Hill.
To date, the FDA has not yet published its regulatory agenda, yet available insights do signal the FDA’s removal of its sugar reduction actions. The agency published its updated FDA Foods Program Guidance Under Development, which no longer lists a project spearheading the definition of low added sugar claims.
In its letter, the CSPI wrote to the FDA proposing seven strategies for the agency to adopt to lower the amount of added sugar in the US food and drink sector. The aim, underpinning these recommendations, is to empower consumers with information to make healthy choices, combating misleading marketing and improving the US food supply’s healthfulness.
“We want to ensure that the Secretary is aware of all the actionable policy options available to his agency, especially as he is engaged in developing the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission 100-day report, which is expected to include the Commission’s recommended strategies to improve US children’s health,” said Hill.
The CSPI wants the US government to establish added sugar reduction targets for packaged and restaurant food that are similar to the FDA’s existing sodium reduction targets. Through its sodium feedback loop, the FDA establishes sodium targets, monitors the food supply, evaluates progress towards targets, and engages with stakeholders.
The CSPI is also calling for the Trump administration to mandate front-of-package nutrition labels that highlight when foods are high in added sugar. It also recommends that the administration adopts definitions for “low added sugar” claims and take enforcement action to prevent claims like “lightly sweetened” and “less sweet” on products high in added sugar.
The non-profit also wants US leaders to tackle misleading marketing relating to toddler formulas, which contain added sugar and are not recommended for younger children.
From a manufacturing perspective, the CSPI wants to see the Trump administration encourage companies to label their foods as “healthy” when they meet the FDA’s newly updated definition. The CSPI wants to ensure food shoppers can access complete and transparent nutrition and ingredient information when buying groceries online.
18 Nov 2025
Gen Z and millennial consumers’ preferences for transparency, functionality, and purpose are “redefining the very nature of consumption itself”, says SPINS.
Read more
17 Nov 2025
Trend forecasters expect food and drink to move more fluidly across occasions, functions, and formats as consumers seek versatility, novelty, and convenience.
Read more
13 Nov 2025
Divi’s Nutraceuticals offers a large portfolio of innovative, high-quality ingredients for foods, beverages, and supplements, with bespoke solutions and expert support for product success.
Read more
13 Nov 2025
Paradise Fruits Solutions and Paradise Fruits Health will showcase their combined expertise in delivering innovative, fruit-based solutions to the food and beverage industry at the upcoming Fi Europe trade show (2-4 December 2025, Paris).
Read more
10 Nov 2025
Ingredients companies are being urged to enter “a new era of partnership and innovation” following the launch of the industry’s first non-UPF verification scheme.
Read more
6 Nov 2025
From ice cream to dips and ready meals, cottage cheese is experiencing a renaissance as a high-protein, clean ingredient for health-conscious consumers.
Read more
5 Nov 2025
Some popular protein bars contain more fat, carbs, and/or sugars than claimed on their labels, independent nutrition testing reveals.
Read more
27 Oct 2025
Promoting the protein content of meat-free products is a more effective sales strategy than adding carbon labels, a study of UK bakery chain Greggs suggests.
Read more
27 Oct 2025
Agrigum has transformed gum acacia into a natural, science-backed fibre that supports gut health, sustainability, and innovation across global food and nutrition applications.
Read more
23 Oct 2025
Joe Wicks’ deliberately dangerous protein bar is fuelling anti-UPF sentiment – but there are concerns that his messaging is misguided and could have unintended consequences.
Read more